So why did they decide to call it Java?

When Time magazine known as Java just one of the 10 best items of 1995, a new American marketing legend was born. Who’s to say no matter whether Sun Microsystems’ prized technologies would have fared so nicely if its title experienced remained Oak or Greentalk, two of the previously alternatives.

We all know the tale: Give absent an sophisticated, open up source programming ecosystem and the environment will defeat a path to your doorway. No sweat, no issue what you make a decision to phone it. The people charged with establishing a brand identification for Sun’s programming language for next-generation software builders, even though, determined upon a espresso metaphor for their trademark. Oak, the former identify, was taken. But why they chose Java by their very own accounts, was a thing of a secret.

This team job interview, initially posted by JavaWorld in 1996, offers a fascinating search again on how Java got its name. 

How Java became Java

“The legal professionals had told us that we could not use the name ‘OAK’,” said Frank Yellin, then a senior engineer at Sunshine. That identify was now trademarked by Oak Technologies:

So, a brainstorming session was held to arrive up with concepts for a new title. The session was attended by all users of what was then known as the Are living Oak group, those people of us actively working on the new language. The conclusion outcome was that about 10 doable names ended up chosen. They ended up then submitted to the legal section. A few of them came back again clean up: Java, DNA, and Silk. No one remembers who 1st came up with the identify “Java.” Only a person individual, to the ideal of my knowledge, has ever prompt in community to staying the creator of the title.

Kim Polese, who was the Oak product or service supervisor at the time, remembers issues in another way. “I named Java,” she stated:

I put in a great deal of time and power on naming Java because I desired to get specifically the correct title. I preferred a little something that mirrored the essence of the know-how: dynamic, innovative, energetic, enjoyable. Because this programming language was so one of a kind, I was identified to keep away from nerdy names. I also failed to want something with ‘net’ or ‘web’ in it, because I find all those names pretty forgettable. I required some thing that was interesting, special, and effortless to spell and pleasurable to say.

“I gathered the staff together in a room, wrote up on the whiteboard phrases like ‘dynamic,’ ‘alive,’ ‘jolt,’ ‘impact,’ ‘revolutionary,’ et cetera, and led the group in brainstorming,” Polese mentioned. “The identify Java emerged during that session. Other names incorporated DNA, Silk, Ruby, and WRL, for WebRunner Language—yuck!

Sami Shaio, then a Sunlight engineer, recalls the brainstorming assembly, held sometime about January of 1995. “It’s basically tricky to say in which ‘Java’ initial came from, but it ended up on the listing of candidates we chose … together with Silk, Lyric, Pepper, NetProse, Neon, and a host of other people too uncomfortable to point out.”

“Some other candidates ended up WebDancer and WebSpinner,” explained Chris Warth, who was an engineer on the challenge from its inception:

Despite the fact that marketing wanted a title that implied an association with the net or the web, I assume we did quite perfectly to decide on a name that wasn’t involved with either a person. Java is possible to locate a genuine property in programs significantly from the online, so it is most effective that it was not pigeonholed early.

James Gosling, Java’s creator, remembers that the identify originated in a conference where “about a dozen folks acquired alongside one another to brainstorm.”

The conference, organized by Kim Polese, was essentially continuous wild craziness. A lot of persons just yelled out text. Who yelled out what initially is unknowable and unimportant. It felt like fifty percent of the words in the dictionary were yelled out at a single time or a different. There was a good deal of: “I like this because…” and “I never like that because…” And in the finish, we whittled it down to a checklist of about a dozen names and handed it off to the attorneys.

“We had been genuinely disgusted and fatigued from all the marathon hacking we’d been executing at the time, and we still hadn’t discovered a title that we could use,” mentioned Timothy Lindholm, an engineer on the challenge:

We ended up pressed for time, as adopting a new name intended a whole lot of work, and we had releases coming up. So we established up a conference to thrash out a listing of names … I do not remember there remaining a distinct winner of Java … Among the individuals of the primary team that I have talked to about this, most deny any memory of Java getting anything but some thing that bubbled out of the team dynamic.

“I believe that the title was initial recommended by Chris Warth,” mentioned Arthur van Hoff, then a senior engineer:

We experienced been in the assembly for hrs and, when he was ingesting a cup of Peet’s Java, he picked “Java” as an example of nevertheless another title that would hardly ever work. The first response was mixed. I imagine the last candidates were being Silk, DNA, and Java, having said that. I recommended Lingua Java, but that didn’t make it … We could not trademark the other names, so Java finished up currently being the name of selection. In the finish, our marketing individual, Kim Polese, ultimately determined to go in advance with it.

How they landed on coffee

“I take a look at-promoted the names at events, and on my friends and relatives associates,” Polese recalled. “And Java obtained the most good reactions of all the candidates.”

Because it wasn’t sure that we would get any of the names cleared as a result of trademark, I chosen about 3 or four and worked with the legal professionals on clearing them. Java passed, and it was my favored, so I named the language Java and subsequently named the browser HotJava, a a great deal superior identify than WebRunner. The engineers had a tricky time parting with Oak, but they ultimately got used to it … I felt that branding was extremely significant for the reason that I wished Java to be a typical. So I concentrated on constructing a extremely solid brand for Java.

Yellin recalled a closing meeting to vote on the identify:

Each individual man or woman obtained to rank Java, DNA, and Silk in purchase of their choice. The exact name that bought the most “most-favourite” votes also acquired the most “minimum-favored” votes. So it was dropped. And of the remaining two, Java acquired the most votes. So it grew to become the desired identify.

“It arrived down to Silk or Java, and Java won out,” Shaio remembered:

James Gosling seemed to favor Java more than Silk. Kim Polese had the remaining say above the identify, given that she was the product or service supervisor. But most decisions back again then have been done by everybody kind of agreeing, and then a person would just say, “Alright, this is what we are executing.”

Eric Schmidt, then Sun’s main know-how officer, reported he was particular about the origin of the name:

We achieved in early 1995 at 100 Hamilton in just one of our normal functioning testimonials for minor businesses like Oak. Bert Sutherland was the senior supervisor at the time—he labored for me—and he and Kim and a couple of many others such as James [Gosling] ended up there. Kim presented that: a single, we had to opt for a new title now, and two, Oak—which we have been all utilised to—was taken. As I remember, she proposed two names, Java and Silk. Of the two, she strongly most popular Java and represented that the [Live Oak] staff was in settlement. Bert and I made a decision to approve her recommendation, and the selection was made. For these factors, I consider it is correct to give Kim the credit for the title. She presented it and offered it, and then manufactured it materialize in marketing.

But, “I do seem to be to remember that Kim was at first lukewarm on the title ‘Java,'” recalled Chris Warth:

At the time we were being also hoping to rename our browser from WebRunner—which had been presently taken by Taligent—to some thing that wasn’t presently trademarked. Kim needed issues like WebSpinner or even WebDancer, anything that would make it distinct that this was a Planet Vast World wide web item. The trademark search was accomplished, and after a number of weeks a limited record of cleared names arrived back again … There seemed to be an infinite collection of conferences and approvals that ended up necessary—as if the name have been in fact meaningful.

“Kim needed us to hold up the release so we could uncover a far better title than Java, but she was overruled by the engineers, specifically James and Arthur [van Hoff] and myself,” Warth said:

At just one level James explained we had been heading to go with Java and HotJava, and Kim sent some email inquiring us to wait around for other names that could clear. James wrote again and reported “no,” we have been going with what we had. And we just did a very brief established of renames in the supply code and place the release out … In the conclusion, I feel the marketeers and vice presidents had significantly fewer to say about the identify than the engineers who were being dying to get some thing out the door.

“I believe Kim is rewriting history a little bit when she indicates that she picked this title for some savvy marketing purpose,” Warth included. “We ended up with this name since we ran out of alternatives and we wished to get our products out. The marketing justifications arrived afterwards.”

Sleepless in Palo Alto

“I really don’t assert to be the a person who very first proposed the title,” mentioned Warth when questioned about van Hoff’s assertion. “It absolutely was Peet’s Java we had been ingesting, but it could have been me or James or someone else. I just don’t remember precisely who mentioned it.”

“The emotion among myself and James and the other engineers was that we could contact it ‘xyzzy’ and it would still be popular,” Warth added. “In the conclude it isn’t going to make any difference who originally instructed the title, because it in the long run was a team decision— possibly aided along by a handful of caffeinated people.”

Timothy Lindholm, the engineer, concluded:

I feel that the extent to which the folks concerned have regarded the historical past of Java’s name without arriving at any typically agreed-upon resolution displays that the naming of Java was not finished by some heroic unique, but was a by-merchandise of a innovative and driven team seeking incredibly tough to attain their goals, of which this identify was a part.” I would encourage you not to try over and above what is sensible in ascribing the naming of Java to an particular person. That is only not the way matters worked in all those days. Never be fooled by how persons and the media have subsequently filtered a lot of things of Java’s development to healthy their personal finishes.

Authentic job interview and tale by Kieron Murphy for JavaWorld, 1996. Current for InfoWorld, 2022.

Copyright © 2022 IDG Communications, Inc.